Fascinating article. She labels the reporting on Jones “a smear,” but doesn’t make the slightest attempt to show where it is inaccurate. Apparently saying someone is a commie is a smear even if he has publicly stated he is a commie.
It was a “guilt by association” smear. By trying to label WND as specious, the implication is anything coming from them is worthless. Ergo, all this stuff about Jones. That’s the best they can come up with? Huh.