Again, your opinion and 5 dollars. The records clearly demonstrate, by the letters from SI, from the investigation by the OSC, and the last investigation by the Congressional staff, that the allegations were unfounded. The question of overdue books is a red herring, but how does one determine from unopened mail on a desk what is contained in unopened letters on a desk, especially when the desk is not yours, in an office which is not yours.
Two ultra-religious DI proponents who have an interest in promoting the lie of a persecution.
You are the liar. Plus "NCSE HAD NO BUSINESS..."
And I'm still trying to find evidence of any misinformation about him
Learn to look beyond your nose. An email(8/26/2004) from Hans Sues, Associate Director for Research and Collections, NMNH, replying to Eugenie Scott, NCSE, stated ...
I was interested to see that you characterize von Sternberg as a young-earth creationist.
That was just one.
... that he mishandled artifacts and books. A fact that the report glosses over because it was written for the consumption of ID backers.
You are the liar.
Santorum and Souder weren't ID backers? That's a new one. I guess the Santorum Amendment was named after someone else.
I was interested to see that you characterize von Sternberg as a young-earth creationist.
Second-hand. Show me in the emails where she actually claimed Sternberg was a YEC.
OTOH, it's interesting that a bunch of creationists would call such a claim slanderous.