Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry

[[What sort of lifespan would God’s greatest creature, in His own image, Adam, have to have had, in order to exist until the final day, yom, age, era, eon or whatever you want to spin it into being, in order for the hundreds of millions of years required for evolution to produce man, to work at all?]]

As well- we MUST ignore God’s word tellign us that there was no spirit death BEFORE the fall, because IF man evolved over billions of years, there most certainly would have had to be spirit death before the fall- so I guess large chunks of God’s word that don’t fit the macroevolutionary timeframe therefore must be ignored, dismissed, and thrown out- As Well, we’re told God ‘looked around’ for a mate for Adam, and couldn’t find a suitable one of the same kind, and had to create one because it was not good that man should be alone- but here again, apparently we must iognore God’s word in order to beleive a mate materialized through billions of years of macroevolution.

One has to wonder just how those who beleive in macroevolution can claim to ‘beleive the bible’ when they throw so much of it out- one has to wonder by what criteria they pick and choose which passages to beleive and which to ignore


433 posted on 09/05/2009 1:11:31 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop; metmom; GodGunsGuts; Agamemnon

“As well- we MUST ignore God’s word tellign us that there was no spirit death BEFORE the fall, because IF man evolved over billions of years, there most certainly would have had to be spirit death before the fall- so I guess large chunks of God’s word that don’t fit the macroevolutionary timeframe therefore must be ignored, dismissed, and thrown out- As Well, we’re told God ‘looked around’ for a mate for Adam, and couldn’t find a suitable one of the same kind, and had to create one because it was not good that man should be alone- but here again, apparently we must iognore God’s word in order to beleive a mate materialized through billions of years of macroevolution.

One has to wonder just how those who beleive in macroevolution can claim to ‘beleive the bible’ when they throw so much of it out- one has to wonder by what criteria they pick and choose which passages to beleive and which to ignore”


Yup....good observations cottshop and moreover, it’s been pointed out time and again that the evos argue that they themselves are nothing mroe than great apes.

Chrissy Fit Matthews immediately comes to mind and after all he makes such a stunning argument: he flings his poo in the form of spittle, but apparently he really consciously and subconsciously buys it and more importantly... sells it, all out!

But liberals are always left with the obvious scientific questions that are obvious to everyone but themselves: the issue of having a soul.

So many evos claim to believe in God, or even claim to be Christians, (and for many if not most of them I beliueve they’re sincere) but you’ve hit on something I’ve been saying myself...their soulless great ape issues aren’t exactly going away for them so easily, eh?

And watch a liberal twist in the wind when they whine about science and “make believe/fairy tales” and it’s pointed out that science has inserted itself on that very issue they demand be kept sterilized from their liberal sensibilities:

the scientific study of prayer!


533 posted on 09/05/2009 7:34:19 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson