Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paul51
I have to disagree with you on that. The interviewer set out to make the congressman look like a total fool and he succeeded wildly.

For a person to behave like Stark did, using foul language while being recorded, and actually threatening the interviewer with physical harm, (on camera) clearly shows the interviewee felt trapped, and backed into a corner.

Stark was obviously ill equipped to handle these questions, and his logic and reason reached a dead end, and all that was left was profanity and threats.

I personally have seen this many times when people are backed into a corner with really hard questions, and they know damn well their responses will clearly be seen as inconstant or just flat out lies.

167 posted on 09/04/2009 6:45:38 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2

Exactly...

Keep in mind, though, that Mr. Stark’s behavior won his freedom from the interviewer. He didn’t answer the questions to which you refer and therefore his strategy worked and he got away...

I’m disappointed with the interviewer for badgering him and allowing him to use this technique to end the interview.

It’s nice to be reminded the Mr. Stark is a pompous a**, but he again was able to run cover for those he serves...

Not good for us.


169 posted on 09/04/2009 9:14:35 PM PDT by cliniclinical (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson