Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredJake

When I first learned about world population, it stood at two and half billion. Now it is over six and a half billion. Maybe that colors my view of the situation. At the same time I was learning what the phrase “exponential growth” meant.


22 posted on 09/02/2009 3:22:26 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand; Not gonna take it anymore; MamaB; GladesGuru; Dan(9698)

From the Article,

As of 2 September 2009, the Earth’s population is estimated by the United States Census Bureau to be 6.781 billion. That is a lot of people, and the earth worshipers believe that number is way too high for the planet to properly sustain life. Sadly, very few people realize how preposterous the idea of mankind overpopulating the earth really is. If you take into consideration the latest figures that shows the average human family contains a Mother a Father and 2.5 children, than you will be surprised to learn that the world’s population would fit comfortably inside the borders of the country of Australia.

By calculating the number of acres just in Australia alone, you may be shocked at how very unpopulated the earth really is. There are 1,899,461,760 acres of land in the continent of Australia. At 43,560 square feet per acre, that means there is a grand total of 82,740,554,265,600 square feet in Australia. Now, consider that the latest figures for the estimated size of an average family lot with a 2,200 square foot house in the year 2010 will be 11,870 square feet. Now if we calculate the size of the average human family which is 4.5 humans, you will see that every family could actually have a house with a lot size of 54,908 square feet, which is about 4½ times the size that your local city planning commission will allow you to have. That my friends, would leave the rest of the world for food production and other raw material collection.

Now these numbers get even better when you factor in the new technology we have that would allow for super high density populations, such as 1000+ unit apartment complexes. Then when you take into account the portion of the world’s population that is under the age of 18. You could probably give a couple acres to each family of the entire world and comfortably fit them all in Australia. Also, Australia is the smallest continent on the planet, whereas Asia has 477,820,303,488,000 sq/ft and Africa has 32,554,273,973,760 sq/ft. Finally, if you took the amount of habitable land in the world 1,449,676,800,000,000 sq/ft and divided it by the world’s population, you could theoretically give each person, regardless of age, 213,785 square feet of land, which would be about 4.9 acres per person.


32 posted on 09/02/2009 3:33:52 PM PDT by Korah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

yep...but it has zero to do with folks like the Duggars.

world pop growth has been spurred by adequate food and medical getting to once desperate locales where babies died off like flies


83 posted on 09/03/2009 8:02:48 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson