Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Albion Wilde

The key phrase is “shall include.” The RFP does not expressly limit the data collection to messages sent only to EOP maintained pages.

Even if this really smelly program doesn’t have a much broader application planned—and I am not at all convinced they don’t—this is a hugely dangerous precedent. All government programs exploit to the max the tiniest loophole, and interpret even the tightest-range authority in its very broadest possible way. And that goes for all administrations. With this one, we’ve got a real problem on our hands.

I know your call for caution is not meant as a blanket defense, and your reasoned approach would make sense if we were dealing with an administration with a track record of restraint. But this administration has already given us ample reason to reject a default assumption of restraint and respect for individual liberties and personal privacy.

I simply do not trust these people. At all.


102 posted on 09/02/2009 7:31:31 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Eroteme

Excellent reply. I agree, they have forfeited trust.


113 posted on 09/02/2009 7:53:13 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("A cultural problem cannot be solved with a political solution." -- Selwyn Duke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson