Sorry, lady, on legal technicalities, you may know what you’re talking about but, this isn’t right!! Lawyers defending the actions and policies developed by other sleazy lawyers doesn’t cut it. These people were not declared non compos mentos by busy bodies whose track record at “protecting” people leaves a lot to be desired.
I don’t believe that these people need to become wards of the state, they MIGHT need a tiny amount of assitance but, from the sounds of it, the state has only made things worse and is stealing them blind!
As the saying goes, doing something just because you can doesn’t make it right.
To protect us from a Tyrant! Tyrannical Government etc. OMG it almost sounds like we are understanding what the founders were up against. This is why we have a Second (2) Amendment!
I believe that I wrote that it didn’t sound like the right thing was being done here. And, technically, the state is not stealing them blind. It is whomever the Probate Court appointed as guardian that is making the bad decisions. Also ... Probate Court judge used to be an elected position IIRC. Perhaps this judge should be out on his rear.