The problem is that the author presents zero, absolutely no evidence to support his assertion. So since he simply will not see any other alternative explanation because of his ignorance/misunderstanding/bias/belief that is what makes this a textbook example of an argument from personal incredulity.
It is too complicated for me to understand, so that proves that God did it is not a valid argument.
What evidence do you have of me presenting a fallacy of negative proof argument?
The problem is that evolutionists present zero, absolutely no evidence to support their assertion either. So since they will not see any other alternative explanation because of their ignorance/misunderstanding/bias/belief that is what makes their explanation a textbook example of an argument from person credulity.
It is too complicated for you to understand, so that proves that nature did it is not a valid argument.
The evidence for you engaging in the negative proof fallacy is the same evidence for the argument from ignorance claim.