[Non-Sequitur]

Never mind, found it myself. From the complaint: "On or about August 17, 2009, Plaintiff Captain Connie Rhodes, M.D. F.S. received from the Defendants in this cause what appeared to be facially valid orders mobilizing him to active duty as an medical specialist with the United States Army at Fort Benning for frontline “GWOT” service in Afghanistan on Saturday, September 5, 2009.""

Is Orly Taitz completely stupid? Or is the concept of proof-reading her cut-n-paste legal filings completely foreign to her?

[stevestras]

“Is Orly Taitz completely stupid? Or is the concept of proof-reading her cut-n-paste legal filings completely foreign to her?”

I think this is not fair to Orly Taitz. Having been involved with several legal cases I have found most attorneys make this kind of spelling error. Even those lawyers born in the USA with the benefit of life-long residence and education here.

She is doing the heavy lifting under extremely difficult circumstances. You should give her a break.

[Sibre Fan]

She also says that Rhodes is going to Afghanistan, but the actual deployment order (and the TX TRO Motion) says Rhodes is going to Iraq. There’s a few (dozen) more similiar “issues” — She spells Colum[b]us wrong; she refers to her pro hac vice motion from Florida (in this Georgia Court); She seeks a jury trial for injunctive and declaratory relief; and much more....