FRiend, the thing Obama placed on the INternet in lieu of being open and honest was a forgery, a fraudulent exhibit. It is easy to show that it was not a genuine CoLB, yet you would have us believe it would not be gernmaine to a criminal preceeding? Even an Internet viewing of the thing Obama first tried to slip over as a genuine CoLB can reveal it had no raised seal since the raised seal on the back or front would have distorted the crosshatch pattern in a jpg format or any other net viewing format. ... So now I'm questioning your sincerity. Do you have an agenda? Have you ever gone beyond mere apologetics for the fraud-in-chief, and looked at the Internet exhibits?
This is what happens when lay people try to play Perry Mason.
Tell me, what documents has Barack Obama submitted to any court? None, nada, Zip, zilch nothing O. I don't care if air-drops millions of fraudulent BC's across the skies of Manhattan. It's irrelevant to the court.
There seems that there's no shortage of people who wish that the law would operate the way the think it should operate, rather than the ways the Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Statute mandate that it operate. Sadly, when someone tries to explain these difference, in the simplest terms possible, they get branded an Obama-sympathizer. Ridiculous. But, that's your MO. If you don't like what someone says, you call 'em a name.
You can look Up FRCP Rule 44. Proving an Official Record. If you can find something to bolster you argument in that, I'd love to hear it.