Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sibre Fan

What’s a PACER? Link please.

On what terms was it denied?


186 posted on 08/29/2009 9:14:11 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: bgill

PACER is the court docket that you can subscribe to. Registering is free, but you have to pay 8 cents per page to view documents.

Link to PACER is here: https://pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/menu.pl?puid=

The order is too long to post (three pages), but here’s the “concluding” paragraph:


“Plaintiff has no substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Plaintiff presents nothing but conjecture and subjective belief to substantiate the basis for her claims, citing, for example, “opinion” and “doubt.” See, e.g., Application for TRO” 9, 20. Given that the underlying bases for Plaintiffs claim cannot succeed on the merits, there is no irreparable injury that Plaintiff can suffer. A review of Plaintiffs verified complaint shows that it presents speculation and vague claims that fail to rise to the requirement that it present “specific facts ... [to] clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result ....” See FED. R. Cry. P. 65(b). As an officer of the United States armed services, Plaintiff is aware that she could receive orders to compel her attendance to fulfill her military duties. Rhodes has received such orders, which are commensurate with the orders issued by commanding officers. Consequently, there is no irreparable injury for this Court to evaluate. Finally, Plaintiff presents no compelling argument that the issuance of a temporary restraining order would serve the public interest.”
Conclusion
Plaintiffs application for a temporary restraining order is hereby DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED this 28th day ofAugust, 2009.


191 posted on 08/29/2009 9:24:06 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
On what terms was it denied?

Well for one reason Taitz apparently neglected to sign the paperwork. But the court also noted that the odds of success hover somewhere between zilch point sh*t and none.

Read the order for yourself: Link

So what does Captain Rhodes plan to do now that her military career is at an end?

264 posted on 08/29/2009 12:03:54 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson