His assumption is faith based. He has no values nor data which he then extrapolates his data from.
“Over a period of years it steadily decreases to zero, reverses direction, and begins to increase again.”
That is incorrect. Its is variable and the rate and function to which is goes to zero and reverses direction is not well understood. That is called an assumption and thta is not science.
Please read the paper. He did not make up the masses of the bodies, nor the mass of water, nor the measured moments presently possessed by those bodies.
That is incorrect. Its is variable and the rate and function to which is goes to zero and reverses direction is not well understood. That is called an assumption and thta is not science.
Really?
The fact that the Sun's magnetic field changes dramatically over the course of just a few years, and the fact that it changes in a cyclical manner indicates that the magnetic field continues to be generated within the Sun. A successful model for the solar dynamo must explain several observations: 1) the 11-year period of the sunspot cycle, 2) the equator-ward drift of the active latitude as seen in the butterfly diagram, 3) Hale's polarity law and the 22-year magnetic cycle, 4) Joy's law for the observed tilt of sunspot groups and, 5) the reversal of the polar magnetic fields near the time of cycle maximum as seen in the magnetic butterfly diagram.These features of the Sun's magnetic dynamo can all be seen in a movie of the Sun's magnetic field over the last 22-years (15Mb Quicktime Movie), (15Mb AVI Movie), (86 Mb AVI Movie).