[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[gdani]

Wait, I thought NASA was a bunch of liars because they support such ideas as global warming & the Big Bang.

Which is it? You can't have it both ways.

[Psycho_Bunny]

Lol!

[xcamel]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Russell+Humphreys,+Ph.D.+fraud&start=10&sa=N

plenty of scooby snacks for the masses

[theBuckwheat]

I would like someone to explain how this supports creationism.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Water was the raw material of creation. This theory would not work using the present composition of the solar system. The nuclei of the Moon and inner planets have too little magnetic moment. The hydrogen nuclei of the Sun and outer planets have too much. Only the proportion of hydrogen in an equal mass of water gives the right results.

Even though the author has still not explained how the water on all the bodies in the universe has morphed into their current compositions, he continues to contradict himself.

His theory requires that magnetic fields decay at a consistent rate since the creation 6000 years ago, yet the sun's magnetic field continues to fluctuate every 11 years or so. The author has no explanation for this spectacular failure of his theory.

Additionally his own calculations show that, based on his theory, Jupiter was formed over 41,000 years ago. 35,000 years before creation. No explanation at all for this dramatic failure.

The final blow is that the current dynamic theories already explain magnetic fields for those objects in the solar system where it's been measured. It requires no alchemical miracles to fit the existing data as well as explains the earth's own fluctuating magnetic field. Something the author's theory hasn't addressed.

[JerseyJohn61]

Astro-Space Pings

[socialismislost]

I just happened to click on the science keyword and this article came up. Is this satire?

[MilspecRob]

What a steaming pile of nonsense

[Lando Lincoln]

good...grief...