Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control: a word about 'fringe groups'.
LA Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 25 August, 2009 | John Longenecker

Posted on 08/25/2009 8:05:12 PM PDT by marktwain

One of the easier tactics against Americans is to divide Americans. One of Saul Alinksy’s urgings was to vex people and alienate against each other, thereby dividing them. More are beginning to feel this.

The left in America pushed for acceptance and open-mindedness in the sixties, but when it got its way -- in divorce law, gun control, education, environment and thought – it tended to silence others as ‘offensive’, ‘hateful’ and worse, and created Political Co-reckless, a sort of phoney etiquette that was censorship in disguise. Fooled again by the left, then coerced and punished by the left, as Americans had a genuine interest in compassion and cooperation. We were played.

But this cooperation nullified critical thinking, and too many wound up loathing each other, the short-term goal of the so-called Correctness. Americans are divided by ridiculing some who might have warnings that the present day crises were coming. They were called nuts, control freaks, and fringe groups.

Today, among the fringe groups, you have the currency groups who warn of international currency pre-emption and the loss of our Dollar. They urge recognition of real money, the concept of something with inherent value, such as Gold and Silver. Caution: that means Independence, and it will show up on the socialist radar as oppositional to what they are trying to do. On discovery, though, Americans really don’t seem to agree with what officials are trying to do, and why should they: the Constitution fringe groups point out that the electorate are the sovereign and the servants are.. well, servants.

As real problems arose in 2008 and 2009, the warnings of these ‘fringe groups’ seem to be coming true, and it has a unifying effect on more and more of America. It’s been put recently as awakening the sleeping giant.

There are the food and commodity shortage groups, those observers who see the changes around the globe and understand their meaning for the United State; the rice shortages there, the corn shortages here while these are now prioritized for fuel consumption more than human consumption from the Green Movement. The effect of these is to close all alternatives and to come under a dependency of attrition. These affect prices of other commodities as diverting assets. The sudden need for corn as fuel coinciding with the refusal of nuclear power as energy make one example of how crisis is grown to the detriment of the nation.

There are the Vaccination groups who believe that officials cannot vaccinate and enforce vaccinations without a health care law in place first.

There are the legal eagle fringe groups who point out that law after law is made possible only because of an earlier law, where the end goal was something sneaked in that the people would never approve otherwise.

Then there’s gun control, a division of Americans a few generations by now. Division is created by more than 20,000 gun laws, by misinformed and intentionally negligent media, calling gun owners hate groups and militia-types, and as Timothy Mcveigh-types and gunslingers, vigilantes. America hasn’t even felt this kind of targeting of her as a totality until around 2008 when non-gun owners began to feel the indignity of abuses of powers the way gun owners feel it.

There are the New World Order watchdog groups who warn of how significant all of these are and how and where they are related. These are the overall warning of all so-called fringe groups observers: the idea that all of this comes over all Americans, not just those who spend money, eat food or defend themselves. These come over Americans imperceptibly, seeming reasonable at first, but only too late do they become obviously predatory.

America was warned. By the fringe groups.

Society tends to be its own gatekeeper and her constituents seem to like being left alone. More and more would prefer, it seems, to work without a net in Independence. Has ignoring the fringe groups been the right thing to do, or will America heed the warnings and make the right choice with some help from the so-called fringe?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; culture; fringe; opencarry
Examiners are paid by the numbers of hits they get. Please click on the link.
1 posted on 08/25/2009 8:05:12 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Bump and clicked.


2 posted on 08/25/2009 8:07:16 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Is this guy a relative of yours?


3 posted on 08/25/2009 8:08:22 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Thanks for the ping. Good reading.


4 posted on 08/26/2009 3:01:32 AM PDT by panaxanax (There's a war coming and it ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Ah, those fringe groups. I have looked at what they have to say and will continue to do so. Even the ones on the left.

Unless they are made up from nothing, all the wild theories have some truth in them that is worth knowing. Easy enough to see if only one will.

5 posted on 08/26/2009 3:58:09 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson