To: gidget7
Isn’t this against the law?
And if it isn’t, why not?
Isn’t this unconstitutional as far as freedom of speech provisions are concerned?
5 posted on
08/22/2009 10:53:07 AM PDT by
Ev Reeman
To: Ev Reeman
Of course it is. But since when do these people abide by the law? When have they ever abided by the Constitution. They want to demolish it, not abide by it. Remember what zero said, it doesn't say what the govt can do on your behalf, and he wants a form a new foundation, translation, a new constitution.
10 posted on
08/22/2009 10:56:39 AM PDT by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
To: Ev Reeman
What the dhimmicrats are doing is unreasonable and “unfair”, but not illegal. And no one has lost their Constitutional right to free speech.
I’m glad that the House ‘pubbies are making light of this underhanded tactic, but if what they have to say is important enough they should go ahead and publish their newsletters - outside of the government printing offices.
Then not only can they get across their message but are free to expose the lying dhimmis for the scoundrels they are.
22 posted on
08/22/2009 11:10:10 AM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: Ev Reeman
Isnt this unconstitutional as far as freedom of speech provisions are concerned?
And why don't the GOP do anything besides whine about it? - Like send it out anyway and let it become an explosive national issue if/when the Democrats take it to the next level?
31 posted on
08/22/2009 12:46:21 PM PDT by
LearsFool
("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson