Skip to comments.
The Death of Conservatism. By Sam Tanenhaus. Random House; (book review)
Economist ^
| August 20, 2009
| Economist
Posted on 08/22/2009 7:59:20 AM PDT by ex-snook
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Of interest also is the Economist comment on England's Tory party.
"The Tories should stop worrying about whether their view of the world works in theory and concentrate more on generating ideas that work in practice. They can live without ideology; what they urgently need is balls." --------------- Are Freeper conservatives more focused on ideology or results? What say you?
1
posted on
08/22/2009 7:59:20 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
To: ex-snook
It wasn’t conservatism that failed. What failed were people who pretended to be conservative, but were nothing of the sort.
2
posted on
08/22/2009 8:02:01 AM PDT
by
randita
(Chains we can bereave in.)
To: ex-snook
Once again Brit media betrays a woeful ignorance of the real US political landscape. Their first fatal error was to take Sam Tanenhaus as a credible observor of conservatism. Their second was to repeat his elementary error of conflating the GOP with conservatism. It goes downhill from there.
To: ex-snook
Mr. Tanenhaus is full of excrement.
4
posted on
08/22/2009 8:03:34 AM PDT
by
moovova
(More coffee please...make it a double.)
To: ex-snook
Conservatism was never dead, in fact the failure of Bush and Obama just reinforce that true conservatism has always been the answer. Militant global socialism, by any name, will always fail. At least more and more Americans are realizing it.
5
posted on
08/22/2009 8:04:29 AM PDT
by
RAO1125
(Neoconservatism:Failed. Socialism:Failing (again). Next up: Libertarianism)
To: ex-snook
Sam Tanenhaus wrote a good book about Whittaker Chambers but this one seems to be a POS.
6
posted on
08/22/2009 8:04:42 AM PDT
by
wmileo
(I miss Ronald Wilson Reagan. POTUS #40)
To: randita; moovova
7
posted on
08/22/2009 8:05:33 AM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Audit the FED NOW!)
To: hinckley buzzard
Mr Tanenhaus is hardly a qualified judge of Conservatism.
Best he stick to his neck of the woods.
8
posted on
08/22/2009 8:06:15 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: ex-snook
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
9
posted on
08/22/2009 8:07:09 AM PDT
by
ecomcon
To: ex-snook
They are so blinded by partisanship that they are incapable of seeing any vices in their own side or any virtues in their opponents, and so consumed by anger that they define themselves by what they want to destroy rather than to preserve. This is more an apt description of the Democrats. This is horse sh!t pure and simple.
10
posted on
08/22/2009 8:07:50 AM PDT
by
Jagdgewehr
(The Office of the President of the United States is unoccupied.)
To: ex-snook
I basically see this as someone saying “Do as I say, not as I do.” In other words, get rid of all opposition, no matter if it is right or wrong.
11
posted on
08/22/2009 8:08:30 AM PDT
by
RC2
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: ex-snook
Wishful thinking on their part.
13
posted on
08/22/2009 8:09:09 AM PDT
by
dr_who
To: ex-snook
Oh, almost forgot the question. Ideology or results?
Well, it takes both I think, but right now, Conservatives are DEMANDING results...
Conservative ideology is like a “test tube” and the “demand” is bubbling out of it like one of those high school experiments in which fire and smoke belch from the test tube while everyone in class is standing way back.
Now, we just have to point the test tube in the right direction...and keep the test tube supplied with the materials needed to continue the flame and smoke!
14
posted on
08/22/2009 8:12:33 AM PDT
by
moovova
(More coffee please...make it a double.)
To: ex-snook
“Is Bill OReilly conservatisms mortician?”
***********************
he sure ain’t doin it no good!
15
posted on
08/22/2009 8:12:39 AM PDT
by
gunnyg
("Just Plain Dick")
To: dr_who
Within the next year there will be a book that covers the split in the Democrat Party as it moves inexorably to the left and assumes the de facto title of Social Democrat Party.
16
posted on
08/22/2009 8:13:01 AM PDT
by
Melchior
To: wmileo
Sam Tanenhaus wrote a good book about Whittaker Chambers It was OK, but Weinstein's is better.
17
posted on
08/22/2009 8:13:05 AM PDT
by
thulldud
(It HAS happened here!)
To: ex-snook
Hilarious. It would be illuminating to compare the sales of this book with Mark Levin’s latest.
18
posted on
08/22/2009 8:13:21 AM PDT
by
Rocko
(Report this post to flag@whitehouse.gov)
To: moovova
Full of excrement is right. What a steaming pantload.
Conservatives...want to destroy rather than to preserve.
Right. That's why every Tea Party and Townhall meeting Conservatives are arguing for preservation of and return to a Constitutional Republic and adherence to the virtues of liberty, freedom and individualism as opposed to failed collectivism.
This guy is completely out of touch with reality. Its the communists who want to totally destroy the Republic and replace it with Soviet style oppression and tyranny.
To: ex-snook
YEAH YEAH....this is the same BS that the idiot class tried to sell after NIXON..... Didn’t hold true then and it CERTAINLY is not going to hold true now.
I’m sure we will get 100’s of these fake obits before the 2010 elections.
20
posted on
08/22/2009 8:17:59 AM PDT
by
Marty62
(former Marty60)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson