To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
The kids want the house, but the state to pay for her care. That was my interpretation, too. Not a very charitable judgment of the motives, of course ...
20 posted on
08/21/2009 7:00:43 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(If you've ever discovered your cow eating a guest in the barn, you'll understand.)
To: Tax-chick
There could be a good reason to hold on to the house. The NHS doesn’t pay for everything. A good idea would have been to put the house in a trust for her care. If she needed the money for her care, it would be there. If not, she could leave it to family.
22 posted on
08/21/2009 7:05:57 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson