Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video: Used Car Prices Up 30% as ‘Clunkers’ Program Disrupts Supply
http://www.cardealerreviews.org/?p=116466 ^ | 8/18/2009 | video

Posted on 08/18/2009 10:27:45 AM PDT by wrrock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: Disambiguator
</i>Well, one or more of said parents decided that the ‘69 was getting long in the tooth, or used too much gas, so they bought a 1980 Citation and TRADED IN the ‘69.</i><p?

My first new car was a 1978 El Camino with a 200 V6 to save me money on gas. Still kicking myself for not getting the used 1972 Opel Cadet instead...

61 posted on 08/18/2009 11:34:23 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Yeah. Saw that. Still better than my 60% drop. My 2007 Elantra, however, sitting on a 30% drop at 2 years. Not really that bad - not great, though. At least I could sell it for what I owe on it.


62 posted on 08/18/2009 11:34:39 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Wait until they do for health care what they’ve done for used cars. The criticism so far has only scratched the surface of the foreseeable consequences; what they haven’t figured out may be the real disaster.


63 posted on 08/18/2009 11:35:01 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

I have been screaming about this ever since the details of the program were announced. This screws the poor on so many levels. For starters the real poor are real poor and can’t participate at all. Many lower income people buy junkers and drive them till they drop and that is often less than one year so the requirement of one year ownership and insurance is a disqualifyer. This is similar to my situation I have a car and a truck, I can’t afford to insure them both so I switch the policy back and forth as needed. They are both old and tired I would love to take part, but I can’t because of the switching. Then all these perfectly good used cars are being totally destroyed, the kind of vehicle the poor buy. Then all the parts that these cars could provide are gone as well. I just about cry while watching the news seeing all the 4-5-6 year old cars being crushed.


64 posted on 08/18/2009 11:36:13 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Unfortunately, if the bus is run by public transit you are subsidizing it. :(


65 posted on 08/18/2009 11:39:28 AM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

I would laugh but the teen here will need a vehicle in the next few months.


66 posted on 08/18/2009 11:44:25 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
The dealers probably do not care much as they are selling more new cars. Now if the feds will only pay them their c4c money.

And the auto unions do not care either, as they are making only new cars. Used cars is like yesterday, out the door and out of mind.

67 posted on 08/18/2009 11:44:47 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Obama’s polices hurt the poor the worst. Liberal polices always do.


68 posted on 08/18/2009 11:53:19 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
Hold on to you older full size American luxury car since the value will continue climbing.

The liberal-fascists fail again!

69 posted on 08/18/2009 12:09:07 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrmeyer
Unfortunately, if the bus is run by public transit you are subsidizing it.

That's why I said, "let 'em walk".

70 posted on 08/18/2009 12:12:54 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Has it passed the regulatory hurdles in the US yet?

Yes, and they were going to use the same dealers that sell their tractors. I would bet that they will cut a deal with some states to used a plant closed by ford, GM are Chrysler. Maybe the one in Nashville. VW has one under construction In Chattanooga. KIA has one nearly completed in West point Ga. the new car industry will be different.

71 posted on 08/18/2009 12:20:08 PM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

This clunker bill is government at its best! God help us.


72 posted on 08/18/2009 1:05:07 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Congress doesn't care a damn about "we the people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

It’s also easy to eat cake while on that bus.......


73 posted on 08/18/2009 1:06:45 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
They are destroying good cars and trucks. The stupid as a box of rocks lefties!

Do you think it's coincidental or accidental that a substantial portion of the vehicles being junked were perfectly serviceable, and would have had a trade-in value that would be well over $2,000? I think the program was explicitly designed to target such vehicles. Call the leftists dumb if you want, but the program is designed reasonably effectively to carry out their aims.

Note, btw, that one of the biggest complaints many people have about the program is that their own cars don't qualify because their gas mileage is too good. An easy "solution" would be for Congress to expand the program so anyone who improves their mileage by 4/10mpg would be eligible. I wouldn't be surprised if such a move was planned from the get-go. Note that doing things that way would avoid having too many people look to see whether the program is a remotely good idea in the first place.

74 posted on 08/18/2009 3:22:20 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: supercat

“the program is designed reasonably effectively to carry out their aims.”

Which once again PROVES the lefties are dumber than a box of rocks.


75 posted on 08/18/2009 3:33:10 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Which once again PROVES the lefties are dumber than a box of rocks.

Obama and the Democrats want to make as many peasants as possible dependent upon the government. Are you saying that they are stupid to want such a thing? I'd regard it as evil, but hardly stupid. To be sure, many of Obama's supporters fall in the "useful idiots" category, but the supporters aren't the ones writing the legislation.

76 posted on 08/18/2009 4:05:58 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: supercat

“I’d regard it as evil, but hardly stupid.”

If people advocate a system that has failed all over the world
everywhere it has been tried, they are stupid.

Also evil

Also psychotic.


77 posted on 08/18/2009 4:12:27 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
If people advocate a system that has failed all over the world

Socialism concentrates power in the hands of government officials. It is very effective at doing so. The fact that it is extremely detrimental to the pæons hardly justifies calling it a failure, especially when those in power are seeking to oppress the pæons anyway.

78 posted on 08/18/2009 4:24:25 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson