[nathanbedford]

The author argues that it is the immigrants' own ethnic group which is most adversely affected by the crimes and burdens imposed on American society by illegal immigrants. My question is, how much traction does such an argument gain in the Hispanic voting block? In other words, are rank-and-file Hispanics open to the argument that their basic interests are harmed and not aided by an influx of illegal compatriots?

This argument is important because Hispanics might well prove to be the one demographic that swings the next two elections. I note that arguments made to African-Americans that the plantation economy erected around the ghetto should earn their strongest rejection at the polls, falls on absolutely deaf ears. There is absolutely no traction for the argument that the Jesse Jacksons and other race pimps do not advance the cause of the African American but only exploit them as any overseer of the most brutal delta cotton plantation might have done.

Black race pimps and thuggish union leaders are not motivated to improve the lot of their constituents but to improve the census and thus increase their power with the Democrat establishment. How will the Hispanic leaders behave?

[wardaddy]

How will the Hispanic leaders behave?

none I've seen when it comes to amnesty behave any different than blacks do over identity issues.....and that goes for media types too except very comely Julie Banderas whom that wanker (P)Rick Sanchez called a traitor to her race (half Bogotana lass)

identity runs deep for anyone allowed to