Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

That Galveston storm in 1900 was probably worse. From 6K to 12K dead, a city destroyed.

Not much use comparing catastrophes, but both were most certainly worse than Katrina.


25 posted on 08/16/2009 8:31:09 PM PDT by Jedidah ("Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah

For those hurricanes of which we have measurement records, Camille was the most powerful to strike the US.

We can’t compare hurricanes for which we don’t have the wind data, such as the Galveston or the Florida Keys hurricanes.

The most powerful storm is not necessarily the deadliest - Katrina actually was only a category 3 storm at landfall but obviously proved to be an extremely deadly storm for various reasons.


26 posted on 08/16/2009 8:35:41 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

Galveston storm was weaker but hit more vulnerable area with little or no evac

and slow moving weaker storms are worse than compact stronger faster storms...sorta

having lived through Camille and seen Katrina aftermath...Katrina though weaker did more damage

what pisses me off is that Mississippi got hurt much worse dollar and area wise but the wrong color folks did the suffering


52 posted on 08/17/2009 8:41:51 AM PDT by wardaddy (Aint it hard when you discover that He really wasnt where its at ....Bro.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson