Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/15/2009 4:48:36 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill

Half of the fruitcakes cheering for this puffery would go broke if the transmissions failed on their cars. Unless they could find a mechanic as compassionate as most hospitals and doctors.

The class warfare keeps on rolling.


2 posted on 08/15/2009 4:52:23 PM PDT by silverleaf (If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Is this not illegal. Hey wonder if he will make it so they have to sell me fire insurance after my house burns down. The guy is nuts.


3 posted on 08/15/2009 4:52:55 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

I’ve been stuck today surrounded by CNN ,, unbelievable bullcrap! , the big lie never ends with them... their “non-partisan health care truth squad” had me pulling my hair out.. I only hope most of America is having the same reaction.


4 posted on 08/15/2009 4:53:12 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Hussein hates free enterprise.


5 posted on 08/15/2009 4:59:09 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("A massive joke has indeed been played on the American people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Nobody is holding insurers responsible, what a load of crap. That is going to be news to all the state regulators. Hell in some states like California insurance companies can be regulated by multiple departments. I've worked in the health insurance industry for over 7 years and believe me a large part of my job is dealing with state and federal regulations.
6 posted on 08/15/2009 4:59:36 PM PDT by Conservative Actuary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
"No one is holding the insurance companies accountable for these practices. But we will. We're going to ban arbitrary caps on benefits. And we'll place limits on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses," he said.

The practice of canceling or denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions will also come to an end, he said.

So how is he going to pay for these new regulations? Has the Congressional Budget Office informed him how much extra this will cost? Is he going to allow the private insurance companies to float their premiums up to pay for this expanded coverage? Is he going to allow the government run insurance in the public option to increase their charges? He has to if he wants to have a level playing field (wink, wink).

How much more is this going to add to the cost of healthcare that he says must be contained or it will bankrupt the country?

By the way, the government was unable to sell its bonds and had to sneak out the back door to buy them from a beard at night. So the government is now selling its bonds to itself which is called monetizing the debt. This healthcare debate might be ended on Wall Street.


7 posted on 08/15/2009 5:10:06 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: long hard slogger; FormerACLUmember; Harrius Magnus; hocndoc; parousia; Hydroshock; skippermd; ...


Socialized Medicine aka Universal Health Care PING LIST

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or removed from this ping list.

**This is a high volume ping list! (sign of the times)**


11 posted on 08/15/2009 6:30:59 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

“No one in America should go broke because they get sick.”

“They should go broke because OTHERS get sick!”


13 posted on 08/15/2009 6:34:55 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
No one has seen "arbitrary" until they see Obamacare in reality. By then, we may not be able to put the genie back in the bottle.

vaudine

15 posted on 08/15/2009 8:01:45 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Medical underwriting and pre-ex are despised by nearly everyone in the insurance biz. Big insurers are offering solutions that eliminate them, with a variety of tools that will cost nothing and keep prices down.

However, Obama feels it is better to use the individual market as an example to bash and demonize insurers. For decades, Dems have refused to lead in insurance issues, preferring a total government take over.


16 posted on 08/15/2009 8:18:40 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("How's that 'hopey, changy' thing work'in out fer ya?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
They keep answering with generalities and vague reassurances rather than dealing with the actual content of the legislation, citing passages to back their responses. They will definitely gradually squeeze private insurance companies out especially once their protection under the grandfather clause (section 102) runs out. There is way too much bulverism in the Health Care debate, robbing the people of any substantive and honest answers from proponents of H.R. 3200.
17 posted on 08/15/2009 8:54:08 PM PDT by pajamahadin.com ("They cannot force us. . . They will not control us")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Now he’s gone and besmirched the state insurance commissioners and their departments. “No one’s watching...” Pphhhttt!

This is an attempt to grab power from the states. The insurance commissioner and boards are usually appointed by the govenor.

Heck, if CA or MA or VT decides to mandate sex reassignment surgery benefits and or fertility benefits and mandate for same sex domestic partner coverage, let ‘em have at it.

Those benefits would not be mandated in Texas by Texans. Only by Federal usurpation (violation of the 10th Amendment) could that happen.

“Arbitrary benefit limits?” Please! Specific limits for well-person exams (1 per year), mental health outpatient visits, speech therapy visits, substance abuse visits, etc. are all set by mandates from the state board of insurance, not randomly by the insurance companies wanting to do business in the state.

Lifetime policy limits ($1 million, $2 million, $5 million, unlimited) are policy variations with directly-related premium levels. This allows the consumer more choices in matching coverage and premiums levels. Just as a full coverage auto policy has a higher premium than a bare bones minimum liability only policy.

How will a Federal mandate that all policies have “full coverage” and the widest array of benefits and $0 first dollar out of pocket costs (co-pays and deductibles) for well-care do anything but substantially INCREASE the premiums?

He’s spewing pure nonsense.


18 posted on 08/15/2009 10:35:07 PM PDT by ManFromHouston (Can you hear me now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson