The idea that there is an inventor behind-the-scenes is not far-fetched either when one contemplates the role of George Soros in all of this and I assume that is the reference which you intentionally left unmade.I'm agnostic as to the specific identity or identities of the creators of "Obama".
Whoever thought him up was VERY knowledgeable about us, our strengths and our weaknesses. I'm not sure a foreigner like Soros could have read us so well.
He's a player in the phenomenon, for sure, but mostly on the money end. The creative genius? I doubt it.
I figure Soros for two reasons: First, early on he switched his support from Hillary to Obama event was clearly a turning point in the Obama campaign. Second, by virtue of his control of the finances of the Democrat party together with his control over much of what the Democrats do on the Internet, I conclude that Soros is perhaps the most important person in the party, Obama himself excepted.
Finally, while I agree with you that Soros necessarily lacks the pedestrian touch he is a committed leftist right out of the Frankfurt school/Alinsky school of modern Marxism. Obama is a perfect fit for him. I think Soros wants the radicalization of America just as much as Obama does. Either one of them have an ounce of patriotic feelings for the country. Both have huge egos.
I think when historians write the book (that is if we have honest historians at that time) on the Obama administration we will find that there are many Democrats who are running scared right now and who are falling in line on a healthcare reform that they do not believe it out of fear of an organization created and controlled by George Soros.
Goodnight it's 4:30 AM here in Germany
