To: SmartInsight
"Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia. A less obvious example Is is guaranteeing neuropsychological services to ensure children with learning disabilities can read and learn to reason."
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/Where_Civic_Republicanism_and_Deliberative_Democracy_Meet.pdf
From Ezekiel Emanuel's 1996 Hastings Center article. See link.
2 posted on
08/09/2009 12:30:49 PM PDT by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: SmartInsight
If people were required to pay their own medical bills, they wouldn’t have to worry about the health insurance companies or A GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRAT being involved in their medical decisions. That would be between them and their doctor.
3 posted on
08/09/2009 12:34:08 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Proud member of "The Angry Mob" Est. April 19, 1775)
To: SmartInsight
I saw this and I agree. Trust me, when the Gov’t gets complete and truly complicated control over what services will be available there will be much less of the services available. Look at ANY Gov’t operated service (Amtrack, Postal Service, and a host of others). The only ‘Services’ that grow and are emphasized are things that bring in Revenues (IRS, Licensing Authorities, etc.).
The latter have no possibility of Private Sector competition while the former do - And the results are clear.
4 posted on
08/09/2009 12:40:34 PM PDT by
TCats
To: SmartInsight
"I don't want somebody in between the doctor and the patient," Dean said today on ABC's "This Week."Who has the money in this relationship? It isn't the patient, or the doctor, its the government. Its the government-doctor relationship we need to worry about.
In a single payer system, the doctor is dependent on one entity for his or her salary. The has a chilling effect of resisting directives from the government about how health care will be rationed.
To: SmartInsight
we already reports from Oregon about people being denied care and offered assisted suicide.
what slope?
Its a diving board!
7 posted on
08/09/2009 12:42:42 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Guilty of the crime of deviationism.http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: SmartInsight
To: SmartInsight
![](http://www.annefrankguide.net/en-US/content/disabled.jpg)
![](http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/33d/33dWImages/eugenicshealthycarry450pxh.jpg)
![](http://www.ushmm.org/lcmedia/photo/lc/image/alpha/film07.jpg)
Note that in every one of these posters, the argument is about the cost (the number followed by RM) to take care of those targeted. Sound familiar?
To: SmartInsight; org.whodat
The Gingrich - Dean vid is
here.
The euthanasia part starts at 11:30. (drag the bar to 11:20, hit pause and let it load for a while to avoid buffering)
org.whodat :
note that Newt is warning 'not to trust the government' on this, it's a thousand pages, and the door is wide open for 'community standard' which can easily include dictating who should not get health care.
18 posted on
08/09/2009 1:20:15 PM PDT by
skeptoid
To: SmartInsight
20 posted on
08/09/2009 2:18:53 PM PDT by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: SmartInsight
howard dean is a deluded, demented psychopath. gingrich, apparently, is the master of understatement. “Slippery slope” indeed. Like the McDonald’s menu is a “slippery slope” to quarter-pounders with cheese.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson