To: pissant
There seems to be a misunderstanding in what you have to be to be President. Mr. Fudge is ridiculing those who believe that Obama is not native born, which as I understand the law is a child born on US territory but with two foreign parents. Unfortunately, you can be native born and not a “natural born” citizen, which you must be under our Constitution, or I should say it is an open question. It could very well go Obama’s way if the Court would hear it, but he is already in the job so why risk it. Read the following cases: Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162; United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649; and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325. You might find them interesting.
To: Joehorn1234
There have been long, long, loooong discussions about this since last summer on FR. The decision you cite has been discussed a zillion times already. I mean thousands of pages of discussion.
Just cluing you in...
To: Joehorn1234
There seems to be a misunderstanding in what you have to be to be President.Obama has not even shown the citizenship of BOTH of his parents and WHAT hospital he was born in. That information is on the document he is refusing to show. The fact that we have a secretive fraud in the Whitehouse is more than obvious now.
I say we have a hunger strike in Hawaii where the vital records are kept until 0bama releases what he should have released over a year ago!
24 posted on
08/07/2009 9:58:12 AM PDT by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson