“You cannot use a web facsimile of a single side of an alleged document as proof of anything, especially in place of the tangible, physical document in a court of law.
Therefore, Obama’s web-released COLB is not proof of anything”
**********************
Correct! But if by some miracle a birther lawsuit is actually heard in a court of law, Obama will simply have the State of Hawaii mail a copy of the COLB straight to the court. At which point, YOU LOSE. Unless Polarik is right, and Hawaii has no documentation at all and a Vast Conspiracy is covering this up.
You need to come up with hard evidence to impeach the COLB. Internet rumors and unsubstantiated claims won’t do it.
I'd like to start with a hard copy of the COLB.
What you say may be true, that Obama sends any documents straight to a judge, without letting the other side see anything. I don't know how a courtroom procedure works where one side is not allowed to cross-examine the evidence, but as we know from recent Obama decisions, the rules are different for him.
-PJ
Doesn't have to be that. Just a conflict between what is shown on a certified copy of the Long Form "Certificate of Live Birth", or even on a known legitimate "Certification of Live Birth". Then we've got document fraud. Even if the only difference is that the real BC shows father's race as "Negro", but I doubt that would be the only difference.