[Las Vegas Ron]

It was my understanding that the original had 47,644 and the registrars initials were E.K. rather than E.F.

There is a thread here discussing how there were subtle changes made after the original posting.

Do you have a copy of the pdf?

There was also a good flash version that you could magnify but I can't seem to find it now.

[Sophia777]

Can you guys see me?

I just want a simple answer.

fir gods sake

[Adammon]

Swordmaker (the original uploader) and Jim Thompson (heh), have both posted to the long thread saying that no, the original had 47,044 and EF Lavender and that it was JPG artifacting that caused it to appear differently.

[Andy from Chapel Hill]

see:

https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=adc629e5-d94b-4bab-8988-13d274db22a1

[HelenaGrace]

I don’t think the KF Lavender argument is valid. Orly Taitz herself publicly asked for data on an EF Lavender. She would have access to the original document/photo/whatever.

And she may have asked for that data before the doc was released and therefore before it could have been tainted. But I don’t know if that’s the case.