Sure.
What has that go to do with it, though?
The opinions on that were all over the place.
Besides that, it looks like official Kenyan birth docs look absolutely nothing like either of them anyway.
The 1964 exhibit has never been characterized by Orly as a birth ceertificate. The 1964 exhibit is said to be a certification that a 1961 BC exists, in Kenya, with the doctor named as the delivering doctor, etc. Fabricating rabbit holes is a ticklish task isn’t it? Even WND has made the mistake of mischaracterizing the Orly exhibit.