This conflicts with what WND said on Sunday: WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical.
The "verified 1961-era Kenyan birth certificate" is labeled "Government of Kenya", but in 1961 and until 1963, Kenya was the "British Crown Colony of Kenya". Parent's Nationalities are both given as "Kenyan Citizen", which really isn't correct for 1961, it should have been something to indicate the status of Kenya as a Crown Colony, perhaps, "British Subject" or "UK".
According to a posting in the Washington Independent, a "source" said the document was nothing more than an alteration of a "certified copy of registration of birth" from an Australian "Bomford" document that also had been posted on the Internet.
"There are striking similarities between this document and the one Orly Taitz is passing off as a 'Kenyan birth certificate' for Barack Obama," the report said.
...
"What's more likely – that two Kenyan bureaucrats shared last names with two Australian bureaucrats, and that the numbers on both certificates were identical? Or that someone used this document, available online for anyone who wanted to look, to forge the Obama 'certificate?'" the Independent report asked.
In the absence of some other South Austrailia "Birth Certificate", all one can say is that one of them is a forgery, but which one?
Maybe someone contacted Farah and told him he better lay off or (.....) might happen to someone.
Because none of what WND says makes sense.