Check this out. I just found it. Someone has SAID to prove the Aussie version to be fake because it contains photoshop elements.
it appears that the australian document is a fake. Starting at post 1390, by PA Engineer, in this thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307402/posts?q=1&;page=1351
his daughter found that the australian document will break up into layers in photoshop elements. the layers are latter shown in post 1444.
in other words, the DU deceive and lie machine is running at full speed.
Also, the washington independent is part of a group of “independent progressive bloggers and investigators” that form the center for independent media, who claim to be an “nonpartisan nonprofit organization”. of course, if you start reading their material, you can decide for yourself, how nonpartisan they are.
Yeah, there is some strange stuff going on and the Washington Independent is clearly biased left.
Hold the Presses! My daughter just showed me something.
She had me open both the Australian and Kenyan documents in Photoshop Elements. From there she had me under the Image menu “Divide Scanned Photos”. Nothing appeared on the Kenyan document, however six layers pealed away from the Australian one.
These layers all showed distortion.
You can go on and read the rest of the post there.
But then freeper "rudman" countered here (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307402/posts?page=1903#1903) with information that that tool in Photoshop does NOT detect layers, it separates out pictures.
“Divide Scanned Photos” is for separating out multiple pictures on a scanned document. It will find seemingly natural borders and break them out to minimize the time needed for scanning.
Now do this - take your phone bill, scan it in, and do the same exercise. See what i mean? Any flat document with seemingly blockish borders will break out.
All I am saying is that the work done earlier on the thread with the signatures and the creases are much more telling than this.
Just a last thought - if the australian certificate is really authenticate - or not - that really has no bearing on the kenyan certificate. If that can be corroborated - then there it is.
So the "layers" in Photoshop idea has been debunked.
What we are left is a close look at the document to see if the letters and numbers appear to be placed ON TOP OF the folds in the document, and whether the signature at the bottom is over or under the printed title.
I'm not persuaded by that, but others are.