Thanks. I was able to duplicate your steps and confirm that that information is found on that site.
This corrects something I was wrong about earlier. The book 343 of the 1948 South Australian certification refers to an 1884 registry. So in 1884 they were at book 343. By 1948, as you have discovered, they were into the A series. 44 B would perhaps coincide roughly with 1961 when measured from 1948-1973.
So the registry book numbers on the Bomford document do seem to match South Australian birth registry books.
That, it seems to me, is very telling against the Taitz document. There’s no way that birth registry books in Kenya could have the same sequence over the same years.
The South Australian Archive site has not been updated since December 2006. Seems very odd for a government archive site
Budget cuts?
Is there any way this is a fake site that is part of the hoax?
Can anyone tech savvy verify that it’s legitimate?
http://www.archives.sa.gov.au/