Thanks for bringing this over here. Something I mentioned on the other thread is that the book and page in the registrar’s block is Book 323 pge 47.
Yes, and this cuts two ways. On the one hand it is confirmation that was lacking from Zoe Brain’s postings of a recent certifcation from Victoria that the book/page registry was used in South Australia 15 years earlier. I suppose between 1948 and 1959 books 323 through 999 got filled up and they started with a B series (no A series?) and were up to 44B by 1959. If so (if a similar South Australian after-birth certification from closer to 1964 can be found), the Taitz document is a fake.
On the other hand, until we see some contemporaneous Kenyan certifications (not likely, since Odinga’s got Obama’s back), we can’t know whether Kenya used a very similar form and whether it’s book/page registry system might not have had A and B series. In which case, the Bomford forger (a genealogist?) knew about the similarities and ingeniously created the 1964 certification off the Kenyan certification, knowing that it was close enough to Australian certifications of that era to direct attention to the Taitz as a copy of the Bomford.
The solution can only come from 1960s era authentic certifications from both South Australia and Kenya or at least from South Australia—they might be smoking guns against the Taitz document or they might incriminate the Bomford document while leaving things open on Taitz. So far we know the Bomford document was manipulated but we don’t know whether it was or was not based on genuine 1960s era South Australian forms. We are closer to the latter but not there yet.