Your 2nd point is the one that proves its the BOMFORD one that is the real fake! Do you know anything whatsoever about privacy laws???? Apparently not. The interview I read of David Bomford suggests that he knew nothing about the release of his birth certificate. That means he never authorized the release of any of that information. He should be hiring a lawyer as of yesterday. Instead he laughs it off - very suspicious. He is either 'in on it' or stupid - take your pick.
But I can tell you if anyone posted my legitimate birth certificate on a website WITHOUT my authorization they would get the pants sued off of them and it would be NO laughing matter.
The U.S. has privacy laws. Here is one link They vary from state to state but pretty much all 50 states are in agreememt that you never release any vital record information on a living person to anyone without authorization. And you definitely don't publish it without authorization.
Okay that's the U.S. But Australia has the same types of laws
If David Bomford per his interview never authorized his bc to be published online -- then you have one of two things:
1. A forgery he knew nothing about.
2. A criminal act and violation of his privacy rights.
Either one is punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.
Do I have to only choose one?
1. If someone wanted to create a fraudulent Kenyan birth certificate, why would he start with an Aussie one?
2. What would be an easy way to discredit a Kenyan BC? You could copy the information to another form; hide it on a website where birth certificates normally would be found like an ancestry one and then claim to have magically discovered it.