The Kenyan one does have a section labeled "Signature, Description, and Residence of Informant." Look again. On the Kenyan one next to that section it says: "B.H. Obama, Father. Honolulu, Hawaii. UNITED STATES."
The Kenyan one doesn't have a section "Signature and Description of Authorized Person" while the Bomford bc does; however, the Bomford one is BLANK on that section. Nothing is filled in. Look at that one again.
IMO just a smokescreen from the obots. This may have been done deliberately so that there would be a slight difference between the two so as to appear more legitimate. But being left BLANK is a clue to the opposite. An unfilled out section on a legitimate bc would be highly unusual and suspect. It should at the very least say 'same as above' or something to that effect. There would have been an 'authorized' person somewhere so where is the information at??? Why is it blank?
And we're still back to the main issue: NO GENEALOGY WEBSITE (which is where this Bomford bc was found) is GOING TO POST VITAL RECORDS OF LIVING PERSONS!
Question for the Photoshop experts, how could one shift and delete the location of the creases if forging from one to another, whichever it may be? I would think that to be difficult, if not impossible.
Further more the alleged Kenyan document has what appears to be a rust stain near the entry for mother, whereas the alleged Bomford document has a faint pencil doodle near the raised seal.
It would seem to me, therefore, that the documents must have independent origins.
Frgds,
3/M