[Mount Athos]

Do you think that they maybe printed those 5 stamps BEFORE December 12th, 1964?

No, because we know for a fact they released them exactly on dec 12th 1964. Nice try!

http://j-mydland.net/KUT/Kenya.htm

"Air mail envelope cancelled NAIROBI 4th February 1965, bearing the 1 Sh 30c stamp showing a Hartlaub's Turaco. This series of 5 was issued precisely a year after the first series; 12th December 1964, and was to commemorate the Inauguration of Republic. The machine cancellation says "Shop by Telephone", and was probably the early 60's answer to nowadays comp"

[Genoa]

The whole “Republic” thing is a pointless argument. The Kenyans in 1963-64 knew Kenya was headed for Republic status. They didn’t have printing budget to waste. They would not have had more of the old forms printed, and they would not have had new forms printed with transitional language that they knew would quickly become obsolete. They would print “Republic” forms and would start using them immediately once the previous supply was exhausted.

[DoorGunner]

>>”No, because we know for a fact they released them exactly on dec 12th 1964. Nice try!”

Well, now. The fact that they RELEASED the stamps on December twelfth, 1964, means (by the use of ordinary logic) thst those stamps RELEASED, must have been PRINTED before that date. They had to have known that they were going to become a Republic on that date.

None of this means that the document in question is legitimate. No amount of speculation on our part will settle anything; only a court of competent juris diction.

I am beginning to think that ALL of the birth-related documents out there are false. Remember what Rush says about the Clintons: “There are no coincidences.”

Is it just a coincidence that the Secretary of State is attending some obscure conference in Kenya?

DG