From a random post, found in three minutes search at Ancestry's South Australia message board:
One of my distant Victoria rellies married a man from South Australia, had one child in VIC – then disappeared from the Victorian indexes. Perhaps he moved back to SA, took her and the babe with him, and reared a family there:
Joseph WHITE, b. 25 Oct 1850, Adelaide, SA (per index ref: SA, Book 3, #124)
That's only one of several posts on the South Australia board referencing Books and Page numbers for birth, marriage and death records, up to and including the 20th Century. Australia was a British colony. The British government set up a BMC registration system the same way they did in Ireland and other colonies: the event was recorded in a book at the Registrar's office and indexed in the general records as a book and page number.
Next step would be to look toward Adelaide 1960 specifically...
Look on ancestry for Kenya book/line refs also. See which numbers are closer.
Well, I’m starting to get some good answers. Not the answers I want, but answers nonetheless. And I guess this exercise can be productive if we can see who’s around 44B in both places.
http://boards.ancestry.com/localities.oceania.australia.sa.general/2216.1/mb.ashx
In the district of Hindmarsh
in South Australia
They passed book 44 way way back in the 1800’s.
I’m calling it, the Aussie doc is a fake.
And the media just had to do a little bit of research on ancestry.com to find that out.