[PA Engineer]

Have to run. Leaving your "commercial" criticism aside, you are saying then in your "professional" opinion that the Australian photo is untouched and legitimate? Is that what should be gleaned from your very long post? You did not see photoshop tags (editable by the way) so this was real and not manipulated? From you post it sounds like you are calling the Kenyan document a fraud, but the Australian is real. Was that the conclusion you reached in your very "long" post? Is this what you are telling me and the Freepers on this thread?

Your conclusion is that this is the fraud:

Your saying this is the fraud (Kenyan)?



Your saying this is the truth (Australian)?



Anticipating your expert and reasoned reply!

[Fresh Wind]

I am saying in my opinion, the Australian document is almost certainly real, and the various “Kenyan” documents are almost certainly fakes.

I can’t prove either assertion, nor can you prove any of yours.

Since you have such a problem with “long” posts, I won’t bore you with anything more other than to say that you want that Kenyan document to be real so badly that you are willing to abandon rational thought processes to keep your belief alive.

If that makes you happy, then go for it.