True.
It was the layering info that got the ball rolling to find many anomalies in the Australian B.C.
You missed my main point. The command that was run on the image file does not reveal layers in the image because the layer information is not there to begin with in a .jpg image.
If you plop multiple photographs onto your scanner bed and scan all of them, the command will isolate each of the photographs into separate files so that you don't have to do that manually or do multiple scans. It's a handy time saver. If you do it on a single image, the software is trying to find boundaries that don't exist. That's why it chopped the Australian image into multiple parts, which were erroneously called "layers". It didn't do anything with the "Kenyan" image probably because of the geometric distortion (the software is looking for clear horizontal and vertical divisions).
Start here and read on
Can't now, gotta go.
Ok for the non tech folks ...who is right you or Fresh Wind...?
Last night after being convince the Kenya doc was a fake I became convinced that the Aussie doc was a fake .
There was no need for the Aussies to be hacked (if they were hacked) ...the image could be lifted from the internet and doctored.
all that I have read says the Aussie deal is the fake