It is just a bit too convenient, I agree. Much conjecture that the Aussie cert is bogus. But, it is asserted that the site from which the image came had not been edited since 2007.
So, was the Aussie forgery done in 2007? Of so, why? Was it so that a Kenya cert could be produced in 2009?
It’s making less and less sense to me.
Think about this: the link URL to the “original” Kenyan BC, posted early, early Sunday morning, was quickly changed so that when people open that site they were sent to a different site with another document with slight changes on it. They also hacked the site and added the word ‘fake’.
Who’s to say this Australian BC site wasn’t amended in some way as well.
I don’t know if the Kenyan BC is real or not but I’m darn sure not ready to say the Australian one is, especially since it surfaced from a libtard who magically surfed the internet on his own and found it!