Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RepublitarianRoger2

“OK, I admit I haven’t been reading every single post here — actually, far from it — so I might be a little behind. But it still makes no sense to me. You’re saying that the original is the higher-resolution bottom photo? And someone modified it to change the “E” to a “K” and the “O” to a “6”? And, in the process of modifying it, not only sharpened it but also drastically reduced its resolution down to what you see in the top photo? So basically the reverse of what was being claimed by the starter of this thread?

What the?”

No - the opposite, the original was a lower resolution. And someone, with good intentions I’m sure, tried to make it easier to read, and used something to sharpen the image. This would make the file larger, and make many elements easier to read, but in doing so, the ‘E’ starts to look more like a ‘K’.


914 posted on 08/03/2009 7:54:17 PM PDT by Mashman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies ]


To: Mashman

Welocme to FR. Stopped by for a nice argument, have we?


925 posted on 08/03/2009 7:56:44 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies ]

To: Mashman
No - the opposite, the original was a lower resolution. And someone, with good intentions I’m sure, tried to make it easier to read, and used something to sharpen the image.

No way. You can't take a crappy-looking JPG and sharpen it or enlarge it into a nice, crisp, high-resolution JPG. Doesn't work that way. It would LOSE definition. There is no way that a sharpening tool on that low-resolution image could turn it into the larger high-resolution image.

1,062 posted on 08/03/2009 8:51:48 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson