No. Dr. Fukino gave a “legal” judgement that he fits the definition of “natural born citizen”, and that this was determined by the good Dr’s review of “vital records” (I believe that was the exact phrase) on file in Hawaii. Dr. Fukino has NOT addressed the status of the on-line COLB.
Dr. Fukino’s original statement referred to the original birth certificate. The second statement referred to “vital records”, which may include said certificate. In neither case was Obama’s posted COLB referred to.
Your position is a mirror image to the “fake but accurate” Texas National Guard story perpetrated by CBS against President Bush.
Either the COLB is real, or it is not. “Corroborating” what appears to be a fraudulent document via unsworn hearsay is not evidence at all, especially given the equivocal nature of the unsworn statement.
Remember that the second statement, given its reference to “vital records” in place of “original birth certificate” allows for the introduction of secondary evidence as the source for the pseudo-legal conclusion drawn by Dr. Fukino.
Between that, the online COLB, and the contemporaneous newspaper announcements, it seems most likely to me that Obama was in fact born in Hawaii- as Dr. Fukino stated.
But people will believe what they want to believe. I believe I will have another drink. :)