Yes, it's an interesting development. The Bomford document definitely appears to be legitimate.
The question then is why is the purported Kenyan document so similar? Why would someone make a forgery that used many of the same administrative numbers, yet go to the significantly greater effort of changing the folds?
If somebody was really trying to fake out the court, they would have at least changed the numbers and names.
Therefore, I think it's a red herring. We all need to watch for the braggart.
did bomford say that he looked at the doc recently?
the only stuff on the aussie doc that’s problematic is miller lavender and 44b 5733.
he probably didn’t even compare his original with the current jpg that we have.
If the Bomford doc is legitimate, how/when/how was it photoshopped? Real documents aren’t photoshopped.