[PA Engineer]

Whatever it is that you are posting (I have no idea), has nothing to do with Sunday’s thread. It says Australia instead of Kenya, etc.

It does and it doesn't. The Australian certificate was passed off yesterday as the "real" and "orignal" certificate. The Kenyan according to these people was the copy and the fraud. I am just pointing out that the Australian certificate has been grossly manipulated. I cannot tell you anything more about the Kenyan document in that there appears to be no irregularities in the image. The letters follow the folds and the signature is on top of the printed letters for example. Sadly, the media has already run with the Australian as the real thing and the Kenyan as the fraud.

Simply, we were astroturfed by operatives to throw doubt on the Kenyan certificate and propagate the "birther" image.

[palmer]

Ok, thanks for that info. It doesn't change the task at hand which is to skeptically and critically analyze the Kenyan document (e.g. the fonts on the printed portion, not the typewitten fonts which appear to be authentically typewritten).

The fact that someone posted an obvious forgery does not, in any way, give any more validity to the Kenyan certificate. The obvious forgery may have the appearance of misdirecting the media, but it isn't really much more than a prank.

[brityank]

Wow.

When does coincidence become conspiracy?

I hope someone is keeping Taitz and Berg aware of these machinations. Thank you.