How do we know the first is fake....it does have a G.F.Lavender as Registar...is that it?
The first image of the Kenyan exhibit had 47644 and K.F. Lavender. The tampered with sources were over written to read 47044 (the “0” was actually a letter “O”) and E.F. Lavender.
I wish I knew. I think I need a coffee and a ciggie out behind the barn door.
I ran across this somewhere, maybe the culprit is here? Or am I repeating myself?:
http://www.politijab.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=2099
If you’re referring tot he father son post, look quickly at post #1139 and following. The upper exhibit is a fraud thought the names are authentic people. Aslo, the folds of the Kenyan doc and the Aussie doc are different, with the auusie doc having perfectly clear letters yet are suppoedly in the folds of an aged document and should be deformed by the fold.
Actually there are two Kenyan BC’s floating around. The first one pictured at the top of this thread has “K.F”, the second one has “E.F.” Check my Post #1276 above. That’s from the first BC posted this weekend. I did a little editing to bring out the “K” more clearly.
So from what I’ve been able to gather so far, there are two conflicting Kenyan BC’s and an Australian one that popped up mysteriously today and could be bogus. This one is of a certain Mr. Bomford and seems designed to discredit the Kenyan one.