Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Just a further thought on that ruling. If we look real closely at the segment that goes: "but who have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and are carrying on business in the United States," and simply ask ourselves, "what if they went home" we can see that they did not really have a "permanent domicile and residence here" and therefore their kids no longer qualify for citizenship.

Families that send grandma back to live with the relatives in the old country could really be in some trouble couldn't they?

213 posted on 08/03/2009 10:24:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Just a further thought on that ruling. If we look real closely at the segment that goes: “but who have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and are carrying on business in the United States,” and simply ask ourselves, “what if they went home” we can see that they did not really have a “permanent domicile and residence here” and therefore their kids no longer qualify for citizenship.
Families that send grandma back to live with the relatives in the old country could really be in some trouble couldn’t they?


However the legal interpretations have all gone with the exact wording of the 14th Amendment: all persons born in the US are citizens.


227 posted on 08/03/2009 11:13:48 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson