Sorry. Can't agree. It only becomes a dead horse once LEGALLY verifiable evidence is shown. None of the "proofs" meets that requirement. And the issue is in no way comparable to the Vince Foster business, as we know precisely where and what the needed proof is---the long form birth certificate.
This is as simple as the head of the Hawaiian Department of Health issuing a NOTARIZED statement to the effect that she has seen the document, and it says Obama was born in Hawaii, or her going into court, being sworn in, and making a verbal statement to the same effect.
As to what anybody in the MSM says, I could care less.
My son was born in Nizhny Tagil, Russia, but his birth certificate says he was born in Yekaterinburg, Russia. It was amended by the court during our adoption proceedings to make it easier for us to obtain a copy of it if needed, as the certificates are filed in the jurisdiction of birth, and Nizhny Tagil doesn't have an international airport.
And what's more, the documents effecting the change are sealed, and any government official faces criminal sanctions if they disclose anything about it.