Nothing nefarious. Probably to brighten and make it easier to read, send, or fax so as not to cause damage to the original document. I would sure like to have a REAL forensic analysis of the paper and whatever old prints might be on this thing. It is a copy of he same document. The one you just posted is even more startling. It does look as though someone had this put away for a very, very long time.
I posted on an older thread a long time ago that whoever had this thing would release it if obama got too far out of line or lost his usefulness.
The other day, I said he had missed an important deadline.
My money is still on bill clinton. If that sounds crazy, so be it.
Why replace the early morning image with a different version? No one is going to fold or wear out an internet picture. The first one is more legible than the photoshopped one, so it makes no sense to me to go to all that trouble, including removing the gaping tear at the top. However authentic it may or may not be, it looks fake now.
The current Scribd site photo, supposedly from the attorney, no longer matches the one I copied (the one I posted) from the same address this morning. Why would the attorney have it switched to an obviously manipulated photo? How does that help the case?
Again, the copy with the black background was created this morning by a freeper.