[savedbygrace]

Non-responsive. It was a choice-of-two question. Pick one or the other.

BTW, the Constitution doesn’t define Bill of Attainder or ex post facto either. Why is that? Serious question, and the answer is obvious.

[Abd al-Rahiim]

I responded to your question. You simply didn't understand my answer. I reiterate, "Are you trying to argue that because the Court 'only' ruled that Wong Kim Ark was '...at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States,' they had nothing to say about 'natural-born' citizenship? That's a disingenuous argument, at best." (emphasis added)

Despite readily emphasizing the importance of "natural-born," you are oddly silent on its definition. For the sake of advancing the discussion, please cite a definition, preferably one backed by a SCOTUS case.