Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abd al-Rahiim

Your arrogance betrays your persona. You have not explained how the 14th A can stand as you interpret it without negating the use of natural born citizen for presidential eligibility as an exclusive clause. That is precisely what Wisky X’s owrds call to your attention yet you try to be devious and smarmy to avoid the clear conflct with your specious assertions. As before, have an evening. You aren’t the expert you imagine yourself to be.


1,169 posted on 08/07/2009 7:41:59 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1168 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
I'm not negating anything. It appears that you either don't understand or don't appreciate that "natural-born" is NOT DEFINED in the Constitution. In Minor and Wong Kim Ark, Chief Justice Waite and Justice Gray, respectively, analyzed English common law and came to the same conclusion that given certain conditions, a child born on U.S. soil is a natural-born citizen of the United States. Obama has met these conditions.
1,172 posted on 08/08/2009 6:34:28 AM PDT by Abd al-Rahiim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson