You just made my point, except that legally-speaking, he isn’t a “President elect” until Congress has ratified the electoral college results. Before that, he is of no title , just someone who “supposedly” won the election. If you claim to be the “President elect” and Congress decides otherwise when the electoral college results are ratified, then you, in fact, are not, and never was “the President elect”.
Once you become, legally, the President elect, you still must “qualify” before being allowed to ascend to the office of President. That can only mean one thing, meet qualification standards for the office of President which include eligibility requirements.
Your opinion does not make a person the “President elect”. Congressional ratification of the electoral college results does that. Your opinion doesn’t get rid of the term “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify.” There is only a President elect AFTER ratification, not before. Avoid these points all you want. I’ll take my argument in court.