Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
I tried to look up information on ancestry.com. I don’t have an international account, but there are SEVERAL birth records from 1960-1963 in the Swedish database, I just can’t view them.
If someone has an extra $30 to get a worldwide ancestry membership, we might could find some collaboration there.
I know, I saw Wikipedia didn’t have the info quite right too.
And I am out of popcorn. ::withdrawal sets in::
I can’t believe that the FBI or CIA hasn’t done some kind of background check of our president. I just can’t believe that, while at the same time McCain and Palin and Hillary etc.
It’s English common law, not Vattel, that was the primary basis of our law.
Re: John Jay, a child born in the United States is NOT a foreigner, regardless of the parent’s citizenship. English common law held that the location of birth determined citizenship.
I know of not one single legal scholar or legal historian that holds your view. It’s just a few fringe lawyers who have zero credibility and who simply do not know history.
And all the evidence in Supreme Court decisions confirms what I say. If you don’t believe that, look at the U.S. nationality law, which I earlier posted. It’s right there in plain English.
In all Supreme Court decisions, native born and natural born are used interchangeably. The 14th Amendment states there are only two types of citizens. Natural born citizen means a citizen at birth, since it’s obvious that a person who is “born” a citizen cannot NOT be a citizen at the moment of birth.
I know this is heresy, but Beck is put up there on purpose to pretend like we have a voice, but that’s the key word “pretend”. I don’t trust the guy
I think they have checked on him and there’s a conspiracy of silence.
The ramifications of dealing with a fraud for POTUS would be almost unimaginable.
” This morning on Beck’s radio program during Glenn’s interview of Michelle Malkin, he stated even if obozo was NOT a NBC that nothing could be done about it so we should just drop it.”
Anyone know what the Constitutional violation threshold is for Coulter, BO’R, Huckabee, Hewitt and Beck
that is so egregious that it can’t be ignored ?
If Obama has purposefully committed fraud by declaring himself Constitutionally eligible ,
when he knew he wasn’t ,that’s extremely serious.
I’m not psychic nor do I have x ray vision,
so I have no idea if the “ vital records “ on file in Hawaii show that BO is an NBC
or has dual citizenship or
is an Indonesian by adoption or has used multiple passports with multiple alias or enrolled in college as a foreign student, etc.
What I know is that we don’t know.
Obama is a Commander in Chief who is sending soldiers off to wars to fight and die
and it is beyond unconscionable that he would add to their burden and that of their families,
by allowing this cloud of suspicion to remain over his presidency.
George Bush would never do this to the military and their families.
Obama has a moral duty to clear this up immediately.
Go here and read it for yourself and make your own decision:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html
I got there around 3 and left around 6 so I was fortunate to miss some of the major storm activity. Yeah it sprinkled a few times, but not the torrential down pour it had been earlier.
And the temperature kept fluctuating to the point where I was boiling hot in my jacket at some points...and chilly (thanks to a nice yet infrequent breeze) at others.
I get confused by people who think anyone interested in this topic is devoting all of their time and energy on this at the expense of what they deem “more fruitful” activities.
On the contrary...we can all walk and chew gum at the same time...and I don’t know of anyone who is focused solely on the elegibility issue at the expense of all others. In fact, IMHO, people who are in tune with this issue seem to be more active in the other “more fruitful” issues than most people...or so it seems to me.
Acorn troops?
Musta fell into a black hole.
The document has what appears to be a seal with raised borders. This is what my birth certificate looks like, or the copy I have it.
So does the Kenyan BC also have a raised stamp? If so, that implies that someone on the inside had access to it.
This is my first question.
Post 5155
I had noticed some things about the document.
1. Looks like it has been stapled (left type) so it seems there was more than one page.
2. The stain appears to be, to me, a rust stain. I have seen this from staples/paper clips and such, but it’s either a small item or the item is in only partial contact.... like a bent staple. It’s possible it was caused by another document (with a staple) that was placed on this one.
3. The document has been handled (folded) enough that there are visible tears in the fold. The folds and damage would lead me to believe (if authentic) that it was someone’s personal copy.
4. It looks, to me, like there is a glue strip (as if it were torn from a pad) at the top, this is consistent with many forms I have used.
5. The printed and typed parts of the document look similar to documents I have seen (all US documents) and I see no glaring problems with either.
6. Little can be determined, from a picture, about the paper. Also not enough detail shown on the seal to make a comment.
That’s about what I have, for what it’s worth. From what I see I would say..... it may be a forgery, but it’s not a clumsy/childish one as many have claimed..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.